4.7 Article

Influent salinity affects substrate selection in surface flow constructed wetlands

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 44, Pages 62235-62245

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15036-5

Keywords

Constructed wetland; Salt stress; Soil; Macrophyte; Rhizosphere

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment, China [2017ZX07602-002]
  2. Water Resources Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Province, China [2018064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that under high salinity conditions, soil SFCWs performed better in removing pollutants such as salt, nitrogen, and phosphorous, also promoting the stable development of macrophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities.
To identify the effect of influent salinity on substrate selection, a study was conducted in pilot-scale surface flow constructed wetlands (SFCWs). Compared with gravel and sand SFCWs, soil SFCWs performed similarly or worse at low salinities, while at high salinities, soil SFCWs performed similarly or better in removal efficiency (RE) of salt, total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorous (TP), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Soil generally increased macrophyte growth (especially at high salinity) in terms of biomass, leaf chlorophyll concentration, root activity, and root catalase and superoxide dismutase activities. A general decrease in bacterial alpha-diversity in the rhizosphere was observed at high salinity, while compared with gravel or sand, soil improved rhizosphere bacterial community stability at varying salinities. At high salinity, compared with that of gravel or sand, the soil support of macrophytes and rhizosphere microorganisms increased pollutant RE in SFCWs. This finding highlights the necessity of varying substrate selection in SFCWs with influent salinities for both increasing pollutant RE and reducing input cost, with soil recommended at high influent salinity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available