4.7 Article

A step towards sustainable path: The effect of globalization on China's carbon productivity from panel threshold approach

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 8353-8368

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16317-9

Keywords

Carbon productivity; Globalization; Human capital; Panel threshold model; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified the threshold effect of globalization on China's carbon productivity, showing a positive relationship when human capital reaches a certain threshold. China's carbon productivity increases as economic growth shifts towards sustainable development with low-carbon emissions.
Surfacing the stress of global CO2 emission reduction and the change into a low-emission economy has become one of the prominent economic concerns in the twenty-first century. The essence of evolving a low-emission economy is to raise carbon productivity that can be estimated as the cost-effective paybacks of CO2 emissions. A panel threshold model was applied to approximate the threshold effect of globalization on carbon productivity under the development of human capital by using the panel data of thirty provinces of China from 2009 to 2017. The empirical findings demonstrate that China's carbon productivity increases, while economic growth shape moves towards sustainable development with low-carbon emission. Moreover, the driving force of globalization on carbon productivity is not tediously decreasing/increasing, but it has a double threshold effect of human capital. In line with this, this study finding found a single and double threshold of 9.3478 and 10.8800, respectively, as a benchmark where the relationship turns positive. The empirical findings have suggested several policy implications for the Chinese Government, policymakers, and regulatory authorities regarding this critical issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available