4.8 Article

Passive Sampling of SARS-CoV-2 for Wastewater Surveillance

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 15, Pages 10432-10441

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01530

Keywords

wastewater surveillance; wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE); pathogens; water; sampling methods; surveillance; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus

Funding

  1. Victoria Department of Health
  2. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship [APP1126395]
  3. Water Research Australian Project WaterRA Project [2064/20]
  4. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council Independent Research Institute Infrastructure Support Scheme
  5. Australian Research Council [LP160100408]
  6. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  7. Water Research Australia
  8. Australian Research Council [LP160100408] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passive samplers have shown the potential to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater and demonstrate the ability for early detection of infections at various scales. Compared to traditional sampling methods, passive samplers showed higher sensitivity, with positive results when the SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater exceeded 1.8 gene copies per mL.
The shedding of pathogens by infected humans enables the use of sewage monitoring to conduct wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). Although most WBE studies use data from large sewage treatment plants, timely data from smaller catchments are needed for targeted public health action. Traditional sampling methods, like autosamplers or grab sampling, are not conducive to quick ad hoc deployments and high-resolution monitoring at these smaller scales. This study develops and validates a cheap and easily deployable passive sampler unit, made from readily available consumables, with relevance to the COVID-19 pandemic but with broader use for WBE. We provide the first evidence that passive samplers can be used to detect SARSCoV-2 in wastewater from populations with low prevalence of active COVID-19 infections (0.034 to 0.34 per 10,000), demonstrating their ability for early detection of infections at three different scales (lot, suburb, and city). A side by side evaluation of passive samplers (n = 245) and traditionally collected wastewater samples (n = 183) verified that the passive samplers were sensitive at detecting SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. On all 33 days where we directly compared traditional and passive sampling techniques, at least one passive sampler was positive when the average SARS-CoV-2 concentration in the wastewater equaled or exceeded the quantification limit of 1.8 gene copies per mL (n = 7). Moreover, on 13 occasions where wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations were less than 1.8 gene copies per mL, one or more passive samplers were positive. Finally, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) positive relationship between the concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater and the levels found on the passive samplers, indicating that with further evaluation, these devices could yield semi-quantitative results in the future. Passive samplers have the potential for wide use in WBE with attractive feasibility attributes of cost, ease of deployment at small-scale locations, and continuous sampling of the wastewater. Further research will focus on the optimization of laboratory methods including elution and extraction and continued parallel deployment and evaluations in a variety of settings to inform optimal use in wastewater surveillance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available