4.8 Article

Combined Heat and Power May Conflict with Decarbonization Goals-Air Emissions of Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power versus Combined Heat and Power Systems for Commercial Buildings

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 15, Pages 10645-10653

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00980

Keywords

combined heat and power; natural gas combined cycle; combined cooling; heat; and power; distributed energy generation; air pollution

Funding

  1. Brook Byers Institute
  2. National Science Foundation, Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovations (EFRI) [1441208, 0836046]
  3. National Science Foundation, Division of Civil, Mechanical, and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) [1745580]
  4. ARCS Foundation
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation's Minority Ph.D. (MPHD) program
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1745580] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Emerging Frontiers & Multidisciplinary Activities [1441208, 0836046] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the environmental impacts of a centralized natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and a distributed natural gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) energy system in the United States. The results show that decentralized CHP systems generally increase greenhouse gas emissions, decrease conventional air pollutants emissions, and decrease natural gas consumption, but only fuel-cell CHPs are able to simultaneously reduce emissions and consumption, and are compatible with decarbonized energy systems.
This study compares the environmental impacts of a centralized natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and a distributed natural gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) energy system in the United States. We develop an energy-balance model in which each energy system supplies the electric, heating, and cooling demands of 16 commercial building types in 16 climate zones of the United States. We assume a best-case scenario where all the CHP's heat and power are allocated toward building demands to ensure robust results. We quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, conventional air pollutants (CAPs), and natural gas (NG) consumption. In most cases, the decentralized CHP system increases GHG emissions, decreases CAP emissions, and decreases NG consumption relative to the centralized NGCC system. Only fuel-cell CHPs were able to simultaneously reduce GHG, CAP, and NG consumption relative to the NGCC-based system. The results suggest that despite their energy efficiency benefits, standard distributed CHP-based systems typically do not have enough benefits compared to an NGCC-based system to justify a reorganization of existing infrastructure systems. Because fuel-cell CHPs can also use hydrogen as a fuel source, they are compatible with decarbonized energy systems and may aid in the transition toward a cleaner energy economy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available