4.7 Article

Climate impact of aircraft-induced cirrus assessed from satellite observations before and during COVID-19

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abf686

Keywords

aviation-induced cirrus; aviation climate forcing; COVID-19

Funding

  1. EU Horizon2020 project ACACIA [875036]
  2. EU Horizon2020 project FORCES [821205]
  3. EU Horizon2020 project CONSTRAIN [820829]
  4. Royal Society University Research Fellowship [URF/R1/191602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aircraft contrails are believed to increase high-level cloudiness, but the magnitude of this effect and its contribution to radiative forcing from the aviation sector are uncertain. The COVID-19 outbreak led to a significant reduction in air traffic, allowing for the study of the anthropogenic contribution to cirrus clouds.
Aircraft produce condensation trails, which are thought to increase high-level cloudiness under certain conditions. However the magnitude of such an effect and whether this contributes substantially to the radiative forcing due to the aviation sector remain uncertain. The very substantial, near-global reduction in air traffic in response to the COVID-19 outbreak offers an unprecedented opportunity to identify the anthropogenic contribution to the observed cirrus coverage and thickness. Here we show, using an analysis of satellite observations for the period March-May 2020, that in the 20% of the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes with the largest air traffic reduction, cirrus fraction was reduced by similar to 9 +/- 1.5% on average, and cirrus emissivity was reduced by similar to 2 +/- 5% relative to what they should have been with normal air traffic. The changes are corroborated by a consistent estimate based on linear trends over the period 2011-2019. The change in cirrus translates to a global radiative forcing of 61 +/- 39 mW m(-2). This estimate is somewhat smaller than previous assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available