4.7 Article

Using an oxidation flow reactor to understand the effects of gasoline aromatics and ethanol levels on secondary aerosol formation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111453

Keywords

Secondary organic aerosol (SOA); Ethanol blends; Gasoline aromatics; Oxidation flow reactor

Funding

  1. CARTEEH (Center for Advancing Research in Transportation Emissions, Energy, and Health) , a US Department of Transportation's University Transportation Center
  2. USDA-NIFA Hatch [CA-R-ENS-5072-H]
  3. Tampere University Graduate School
  4. American-Scandinavian Foundation
  5. Business Finland
  6. Finnish authorities and companies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the impact of gasoline fuels with varying levels of aromatics and ethanol on emissions and secondary aerosol formation from mobile sources. Results showed that high aromatics fuels led to higher emissions, while high ethanol content fuel (E78) also had potential for increased emissions under certain conditions.
Fuel type and composition affect tailpipe emissions and secondary aerosol production from mobile sources. This study assessed the influence of gasoline fuels with varying levels of aromatics and ethanol on the primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation from a flexible fuel vehicle equipped with a port fuel injection engine. The vehicle was exercised over the LA92 and US06 driving cycles using a chassis dynamometer. Secondary aerosol formation potential was measured using a fast oxidation flow reactor. Results showed that the high aromatics fuels led to higher gaseous regulated emissions, as well as particulate matter (PM), black carbon, and total and solid particle number. The high ethanol content fuel (E78) resulted in reductions for the gaseous regulated pollutants and particulate emissions, with some exceptions where elevated emissions were seen for this fuel compared to both E10 fuels, depending on the driving cycle. Secondary aerosol formation potential was dominated by the cold-start phase and increased for the high aromatics fuel. Secondary aerosol formation was seen in lower levels for E78 due to the lower formation of precursor emissions using this fuel. In addition, operating driving conditions and aftertreatment efficiency played a major role on secondary organic and inorganic aerosol formation, indicating that fuel properties, driving conditions, and exhaust aftertreatment should be considered when evaluating the emissions of secondary aerosol precursors from mobile sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available