4.6 Article

A Stepwise Assessment of Parsimony and Fuzzy Entropy in Species Distribution Modelling

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23081014

Keywords

Akaike Information Criterion; favourability function; fuzzy entropy; probability of occurrence; Shannon entropy; species distribution models; stepwise logistic regression; uncertainty

Funding

  1. Organismo Autonomo Parques Nacionales, Spain [1098/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Entropy plays a crucial role in the geographical distribution of species, where fuzzy entropy and logistic regression models can help reduce uncertainty and complexity, leading to increased model efficiency.
Entropy is intrinsic to the geographical distribution of a biological species. A species distribution with higher entropy involves more uncertainty, i.e., is more gradually constrained by the environment. Species distribution modelling tries to yield models with low uncertainty but normally has to reduce uncertainty by increasing their complexity, which is detrimental for another desirable property of the models, parsimony. By modelling the distribution of 18 vertebrate species in mainland Spain, we show that entropy may be computed along the forward-backwards stepwise selection of variables in Logistic Regression Models to check whether uncertainty is reduced at each step. In general, a reduction of entropy was produced asymptotically at each step of the model. This asymptote could be used to distinguish the entropy attributable to the species distribution from that attributable to model misspecification. We discussed the use of fuzzy entropy for this end because it produces results that are commensurable between species and study areas. Using a stepwise approach and fuzzy entropy may be helpful to counterbalance the uncertainty and the complexity of the models. The model yielded at the step with the lowest fuzzy entropy combines the reduction of uncertainty with parsimony, which results in high efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available