4.6 Article

Spatial Entanglement of Fermions in One-Dimensional Quantum Dots

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23070868

Keywords

quantum correlations; quantum entanglement; quantum Monte Carlo method

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-19-1-7003]
  2. Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science as a part of National Roadmap for Research Infrastructure [D01-401/18.12.2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time-dependent quantum Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the entanglement of electrons in one-dimensional quantum dots with various spin configurations. The study finds that the spatial entanglement differs in parallel-spin and spin-compensated cases, with outermost opposite-spin electrons behaving like bosons in the latter case. The results are consistent with numerically exact results where comparison is possible.
The time-dependent quantum Monte Carlo method for fermions is introduced and applied in the calculation of the entanglement of electrons in one-dimensional quantum dots with several spin-polarized and spin-compensated electron configurations. The rich statistics of wave functions provided by this method allow one to build reduced density matrices for each electron, and to quantify the spatial entanglement using measures such as quantum entropy by treating the electrons as identical or distinguishable particles. Our results indicate that the spatial entanglement in parallel-spin configurations is rather small, and is determined mostly by the spatial quantum nonlocality introduced by the ground state. By contrast, in the spin-compensated case, the outermost opposite-spin electrons interact like bosons, which prevails their entanglement, while the inner-shell electrons remain largely at their Hartree-Fock geometry. Our findings are in close correspondence with the numerically exact results, wherever such comparison is possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available