4.6 Article

Some New Quantum BCH Codes over Finite Fields

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23060712

Keywords

quantum stabilizer codes; BCH codes; cyclotomic cosets; dual codes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61372072]
  2. Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project) [B08038]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper uses BCH codes to construct quantum codes, finding classical BCH codes with suitable cyclotomic cosets, constructing nonbinary quantum BCH codes, and realizing a new family of quantum BCH codes through extensions. This work expands the study of quantum error correcting codes and improves their code parameters and minimum distances.
Quantum error correcting codes (QECCs) play an important role in preventing quantum information decoherence. Good quantum stabilizer codes were constructed by classical error correcting codes. In this paper, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes over finite fields are used to construct quantum codes. First, we try to find such classical BCH codes, which contain their dual codes, by studying the suitable cyclotomic cosets. Then, we construct nonbinary quantum BCH codes with given parameter sets. Finally, a new family of quantum BCH codes can be realized by Steane's enlargement of nonbinary Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) construction and Hermitian construction. We have proven that the cyclotomic cosets are good tools to study quantum BCH codes. The defining sets contain the highest numbers of consecutive integers. Compared with the results in the references, the new quantum BCH codes have better code parameters without restrictions and better lower bounds on minimum distances. What is more, the new quantum codes can be constructed over any finite fields, which enlarges the range of quantum BCH codes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available