Journal
ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
Volume 38, Issue SUPPL 5, Pages 4197-4215Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01418-3
Keywords
Soil liquefaction; Support vector machine; Grey wolf optimizer; Genetic algorithm
Funding
- Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2020CX040]
- Shenghua Lieying Program of Central South University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study proposes two support vector machine models for predicting soil liquefaction potential, optimized by genetic algorithm and grey wolf optimizer. The results show that the GWO-SVM model achieved the highest classification accuracy on three data sets and outperformed the GA-SVM model.
The prediction of the potential of soil liquefaction induced by the earthquake is a vital task in construction engineering and geotechnical engineering. To provide a possible solution to such problems, this paper proposes two support vector machine (SVM) models which are optimized by genetic algorithm (GA) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) to predict the potential of soil liquefaction. Field observation data based on cone penetration test (CPT), standard penetration test (SPT) and shear wave velocity (V-S) test (SWVT) are employed to verify the reliability of the GA-SVM model and the GWO-SVM model, the numbers of input variables of these three field testing data sets are 6, 12 and 8, respectively, and the output result is the potential of soil liquefaction. To verify whether the two optimization algorithms GA and GWO have significantly improved the performance of SVM model, an unoptimized SVM model is served as a reference in this study. And five performance metrics, including classification accuracy rate (ACC), precision rate (PRE), recall rate (REC), F1 score (F1) and AUC are used to evaluate the classification performance of the three models. Results of the study confirm that when CPT-based, SPT-based and SWVT-based test sets are input into three classification models, the highest classification accuracy of 0.9825, 0.9032 and 0.9231, respectively, is achieved with GWO-SVM. And based on these three data sets, the values of AUC obtained by GWO-SVM are all higher than those obtained by GA-SVM. Further, by comparing the other metrics of the three classification models, it is found that the classification performance of the two hybrid models is very similar and significantly better than the SVM, which indicates that GWO-SVM, like GA-SVM, can also be used as a reliable model for predicting soil liquefaction potential.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available