4.7 Article

Modelling the experimental seismic out-of-plane two-way bending response of unreinforced periodic masonry panels using a non-linear discrete homogenized strategy

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 242, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112524

Keywords

Homogenization; Multi-scale; Out-of-plane; Two-way bending; Unreinforced Masonry

Funding

  1. Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij BV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A non-linear discrete homogenized strategy was used to reproduce out-of-plane two-way bending shake table tests on full-scale unreinforced masonry walls. The numerical model successfully described the response of experimentally tested full-scale specimens and was further used to study the behavior of unreinforced masonry walls in configurations not previously tested.
A non-linear discrete homogenized strategy is used to reproduce out-of-plane two-way bending shake table tests on full-scale unreinforced masonry walls. The numerical strategy represents unreinforced masonry walls as an assemblage of rigid quadrilateral plates connected through non-linear interfaces represented. The material response laws for these non-linear interfaces are derived from a homogenization procedure performed at the meso-scale by a finite-element plate model. This discrete model can simulate masonry orthotropy, full softening behaviour and failure. Bending and torsional deformation modes are represented. The performance of the numerical models in describing the response of the experimentally tested full-scale specimens is presented. The numerical strategy is then used to study the behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls in configurations hitherto untested. Such numerical results are then compared to state-of-the-art analytical approaches. Potential avenues of improvement for the implemented analytical methods are also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available