4.7 Article

Sensitivity analysis of fracture energies for the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM)

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107793

Keywords

Fracture energy; Sensitivity analysis; Uniaxial compression; Direct tension; Combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM)

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41941018, 52074258]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042020kf1035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a new constitutive model based on stress-strain relationship to eliminate the dependence of parameter values on element size. Sensitivities of type II and type I fracture energies, GII and GI, are investigated through uniaxial compression and direct tension simulations, along with the influence of different parameters on the selection of GII and GI values.
The combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM) has been widely used in the numerical study of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Selection of the correct parameter values is a prerequisite to ensure the accuracy of the simulation results. However, current calibration procedures are relatively cumbersome, and the parameters are strongly dependent on the element size. To eliminate the dependence of parameter values on the element size, this paper proposes a new constitutive model based on the stress-strain relationship. In addition, uniaxial compression and direct tension simulations are used to investigate the sensitivities of type II and type I fracture energies, i.e., GII and GI, including the influence of the GI (or GII) value on the simulation results of direct tension (or uniaxial compression) and the influence of different parameters (such as Young's modulus E, Poisson's ratio nu, cohesion c, internal friction angle phi i, tensile strength ft and element size h) on the selection of the values of GII and GI. The following results are obtained. (1) As GI or GII increases, the strength of the rock sample increases, and the plastic characteristics are more obvious, but the failure mode tends to be stable. (2) As the E value increases, the value of GI or GII decreases as a power function. As the value of ft or c increases, the value of GI or GII increases as a power function. However, other parameters, including nu, phi i and h, have no effect on the selection of the values of GII and GI. (3) Actual uniaxial compression and triaxial compression simulations prove that the calibrated GII and GI values are reasonable. In this study, only two fracture energies, GII and GI, must be calibrated; other macroparameters can be obtained through laboratory tests, and other microparameters can be obtained from previous empirical or theoretical values, which greatly improves the calibration efficiency of FDEM input parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available