4.6 Article

Application of the least-square meshless method to gas-water flow simulation of complex-shape shale gas reservoirs

Journal

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 39-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.04.018

Keywords

Meshless method; Gas-water two-phase flow; Dual-medium model; Moving least square; Weighted least square method

Funding

  1. Cooperative Innovation Center of Unconventional Oil and Gas (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province) ,Yangtze University [UOG2020-17]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004033, 51922007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper used a meshless method to study water-gas flow in a dual-medium shale gas reservoir model. The method was validated through a numerical reservoir model with a rectangular boundary shape, and parametric analysis was performed to investigate the impact of reservoir physical parameters on shale gas production.
This paper used meshless method to study water-gas flow in dual-medium shale gas reservoir model. In which moving least square is adopted for local approximation of fracture pressure, water saturation and matrix pressure, and weighted least square method is used to construct discrete scheme of flow equations. A numerical reservoir model with a rectangular boundary shape validates the high accuracy of presented method. Then parametric analysis of a complex-shape shale gas reservoir numerical model illustrate the stability and convergence of presented method and the effect of reservoir physical parameters on shale gas production. In all, this presented method may provide an efficient and accurate technology for numerical simulation of gas-water flow of real complex-shape shale gas reservoir, and this idea may provide a reference for the numerical simulation of other flow problems in real reservoirs with complex boundary shape or geological conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available