4.6 Article

Metabolic network architecture and carbon source determine metabolite production costs

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 283, Issue 11, Pages 2149-2163

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.13727

Keywords

amino acid auxotrophies; biosynthetic cost; Escherichia coli; flux balance analysis; metabolic trade-off; resource allocation problem

Funding

  1. Jena School for Microbial Communication (JSMC)
  2. Excellence Cluster Inflammation at Interfaces
  3. Volkswagen Foundation
  4. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolism is essential to organismal life, because it provides energy and building block metabolites. Even though it is known that the biosynthesis of metabolites consumes a significant proportion of the resources available to a cell, the factors that determine their production costs remain less well understood. In this context, it is especially unclear how the nutritional environment affects the costs of metabolite production. Here, we use the amino acid metabolism of Escherichia coli as a model to show that the point at which a carbon source enters central metabolic pathways is a major determinant of individual metabolite production costs. Growth rates of auxotrophic genotypes, which in the presence of the required amino acid save biosynthetic costs, were compared to the growth rates that prototrophic cells achieved under the same conditions. The experimental results showed a strong concordance with computationally estimated biosynthetic costs, which allowed us, for the first time, to systematically quantify carbon source-dependent metabolite production costs. Thus, we demonstrate that the nutritional environment in combination with network architecture is an important but hitherto underestimated factor influencing biosynthetic costs and thus microbial growth. Our observations are highly relevant for the optimization of biotechnological processes as well as for understanding the ecology of microorganisms in their natural environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available