4.7 Article

The financing efficiency of listed energy conservation and environmental protection firms: Evidence and implications for green finance in China

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112254

Keywords

Energy conservation and environmental protection industry; Financing efficiency; Green finance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the financing efficiency of Chinese-listed ECEP firms from 2010 to 2019, finding that banks are dominant in providing credits, firms listed on the second board exhibit higher financing efficiency, and firms in central and western regions have improved financing efficiency, especially after 2016. Both country-level and firm-level factors impact financing efficiency.
With the implementation of a series of policies related to the energy conservation and environmental protection (ECEP) industry, green finance has become a crucial approach to provide credits for the ECEP industry. Using data on Chinese-listed ECEP firms from 2010 to 2019, this work quantitatively identifies the financing efficiency of these firms and its determinants. The main results show that banks are still dominant in the Chinese financial market for providing credits, and firms listed on the second board show higher financing efficiency. The financing efficiency of firms located in the central and western regions improves significantly, especially after 2016, reflecting the interaction effect of green finance policies and economic policies supporting underdeveloped regions. Both country-level factors (e.g., formal institutions and financial supervision) and firm-level factors (e.g., firm size and debt ratio) have an impact on financing efficiency. These findings have important implications for policymakers who are carefully contemplating green finance policies to support ECEP firms through an effective financial market mechanism, which eventually helps to realize the transition of the energy sector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available