4.7 Article

The role of supreme audit institutions in energy accountability in EU countries

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112413

Keywords

Accountability; Energy; Sustainability; External auditing; Supreme audit institution

Funding

  1. Jagiellonian University, POB FutureSoc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research indicates that the role of supreme audit institutions in energy accountability is still unclear, and current audit approaches are insufficient to enhance energy accountability in the European Union as a whole. The field of energy accountability has a supranational nature with various variables, calling for more substantial involvement from audit institutions.
The implementation of all the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires sustainable energy production and consumption; hence the issue of energy accountability is vital. There are several studies on the activities of supreme audit institutions (SAIs); however, the research question - what is the role of SAIs in energy accountability is still without an answer. Meanwhile, SAIs, as critical public auditors have to evaluate how do governments deal with energy issues, helping not only spend money sparingly but also in an accountable manner. Based on review the audit reports of 13 from 27 SAIs from the European Member States, we argue that the SAIs strive to maximise public usefulness through ex-post audits mainly focused domestically. This audit approach is not sufficient to strengthen energy accountability in the whole European Union. The process of energy accountability has a supranational character with numerous variables. We offer the potentially radical conclusion and suggestion, that SAIs are not ready for being evaluator in supranational scale, and that they should change their current audit strategies taking more substantial involvement in energy accountability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available