4.7 Article

Effects of rescaling the EU energy label on household preferences for top-rated appliances

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112439

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Energy label; Appliances; Choice experiment

Funding

  1. European Union [723716]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [723716] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper finds through empirical research that the resealed energy efficiency labeling scheme for cold appliances is more beneficial in increasing the value of top-rated refrigerators compared to the previous scheme, but simultaneously displaying both labels does not bring additional benefits.
The European Union has decided to replace its previously existing A+++ to D labelling scheme for cold appliances with a resealed A to G labelling scheme in 2021. Employing a demographically representative discrete choice experiment on refrigerator adoption using an online survey among more than 1000 households in Germany, this paper explores the effects of the resealed scheme compared to the previous scheme on the stated uptake of top-rated refrigerators, i.e. those classified A+++ under the previous scheme and B under the resealed scheme. Since in practice both schemes may be shown for a transitory period, the paper also explores the effects of displaying both labels simultaneously. The findings from estimating a mixed logit model suggest that showing the resealed label alone significantly increases valuation of top-rated refrigerators compared to showing the previous A+++ to D label alone. In comparison, when the previous A+++ to D and the resealed A to G schemes are shown simultaneously, no benefits of introducing the resealed label are found. Thus, policymakers should strive to enforce the application of the resealed labelling scheme as quickly as possible and to shorten transitory periods where both labels are shown simultaneously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available