4.7 Article

Waste Plastics as an Effective Binder for Biochar Pelletization

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 35, Issue 17, Pages 13840-13846

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01884

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [STPGP430177]
  2. UBC-Fraunhofer ICON program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using waste plastics as binders could produce strong biochar pellets at relatively low temperatures (300-330 degrees C). The optimal fraction of plastic binder would be between 5 and 10 wt %. As the temperature of biochar production increased, the strength of the pellets decreased even with binders.
The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using waste plastics as binders to produce high-quality biochar pellets from biochar powders that were made from the pyrolysis of pine sawdust at temperatures ranging from 300 to 450 degrees C. Plastic binders (virgin and waste) were applied with 5 to 30 wt % of the total mixture. The mixture was pelletized at a maximum pressure of similar to 156 MPa. The heating value, density, saturated moisture uptake, energy density, and hardness of biochar pellets were measured to evaluate the pellet quality. The results showed that using plastics as binders could produce strong biochar pellets with the biochar produced at relatively low temperatures (300-330 degrees C). The optimal fraction of the plastic binder would be between 5 and 10 wt %. The biochar produced at the higher temperature (450 degrees C) had difficulty forming strong pellets even with binders. The hydrophobicity and higher heating value of pellets were significantly improved by adding plastics as binders. Economic analysis showed that using waste plastics from the local waste recycling program would be an economical way for producing biochar pellets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available