Journal
ENERGY
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120516
Keywords
SCCHP; Solar energy; Operation strategy; Evaluation criterion
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [52090064]
- Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51821004]
- State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (North China Electric Power University) [LAPS202108]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The performance and economics of a solar-assisted combined cooling, heating, and power system depend on the system's structure, operation strategy, and choice of facility capacity. An improved operation strategy called best operation condition point (BOCP) strategy was proposed and applied in this study. A case study of an apartment building in Guangzhou was conducted to verify the feasibility of the proposed system, showing significant energy-saving benefits.
Performance and economics of a solar-assisted combined cooling, heating and power (SCCHP) system mainly depend on the system's structure, operation strategy and choice of facility capacity. The SCCHP analyzed in this paper, contains a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) that is the power generation unit, a heat recovery system, a photovoltaic (PV) system, solar evacuated tube collectors (ETC), an absorption chiller, an electric chiller and a heat storage tank. An improved operation strategy, termed as best operation condition point (BOCP) strategy, is proposed and applied in this SCCHP system. With the proposed operation strategy, the capacities of the main equipment are optimized based on a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. In addition, a case study of an apartment building in Guangzhou is conducted to verify the feasibility of the proposed SCCHP system structure and optimal operation strategy. Compared with these separating supply system, the optimized CCHP system has an excellent performance in energy saving. It can save 15141.63 KWh electric energy and increase heat output by 170183.57 MJ per year. Accordingly, the return on investment is 2.55 and the payback period is 11.2 years. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available