4.7 Article

Development of thermo-electrical model of photovoltaic panel under hot-spot conditions with experimental validation

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120785

Keywords

Photovoltaics; Hot-spot; Solar energy; Experimental; Efficiency; Renewables

Funding

  1. Croatian science foundation [IP-01-2018-2814, IP-2018-01-6774]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on the development of a thermo-electrical numerical model for freestanding photovoltaic panels exposed to the hot-spot effect. Through experimental validation in a Mediterranean climate, the comparison of results between measured and simulated values showed a good match.
This work was focused on development of thermo-electrical numerical model for circumstance of freestanding photovoltaic (PV) panel exposed to hot-spot effect. The model was developed for partial hot-spot situation and for serial cell connection. The developed 3D model uses a novel approach via two-way coupling of thermal and electrical models. The model was experimentally validated for geographical location of Mediterranean climate, using the readings from temperature sensors, as well as thermal imaging data. The comparison of results between measured and simulated values were shown to be well matched, with deviation not more than 1.5 degrees C. The model could be useful for optimization of the bypass diodes and better understanding of hot-spot coupled with other thermal effects. Also, the model can be used for examinations in the case of building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV), since hot-spot effects could be utilized as additional heat sources that could be properly managed. The effect of temperature non-uniformity could be also examined with herein proposed modelling approach and which is beneficial in the case of cooled PV panels. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available