4.5 Article

Effects of Mass and Damping on Flow-Induced Vibration of a Cylinder Interacting with the Wake of Another Cylinder at High Reduced Velocities

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14165148

Keywords

vibration response; damping ratio; flow-induced vibration; mass ratio; reduced velocity; wake interaction; energy harvesting

Categories

Funding

  1. Khalifa University of Science and Technology [CIRA-2020-057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper numerically investigates the flow-induced vibrations of a cylinder interacting with the wake of another cylinder, revealing that the mass ratio m* has a greater influence on the vibration amplitude ratio A/D than the damping ratio zeta. Furthermore, the mass-damping ratio m*zeta is not a unique parameter for cylinder oscillation in a wake.
Flow-induced vibration is a canonical issue in various engineering fields, leading to fatigue or immediate damage to structures. This paper numerically investigates flow-induced vibrations of a cylinder interacting with the wake of another cylinder at a Reynolds number Re = 150. It sheds light on the effects of mass ratio m*, damping ratio, and mass-damping ratio m*zeta on vibration amplitude ratio A/D at different reduced velocities Ur and cylinder spacing ratios L/D = 1.5 and 3.0. A couple of interesting observations are made. The m* has a greater influence on A/D than zeta although both m* and zeta cause reductions in A/D. The m* effect on A/D is strong for m* = 2-16 but weak for m* > 16. As opposed to a single isolated cylinder case, the mass-damping m*zeta is not found to be a unique parameter for a cylinder oscillating in a wake. The vortices in the wake decay rapidly at small zeta. Alternate reattachment of the gap shear layers on the wake cylinder fuels the vibration of the wake cylinder for L/D = 1.5 while the impingement and switch of the gap vortices do the same for L/D = 3.0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available