4.5 Review

Future Material Developments for Electric Vehicle Battery Cells Answering Growing Demands from an End-User Perspective

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14144223

Keywords

electric vehicle; battery material; anode; cathode; electrolyte; battery safety; end-user demands

Categories

Funding

  1. HORIZON 2020-supported EU project COBRA [H2020-EU.3.4.-875568]
  2. EFRE-supported EU research network project SENSE BAY [EU-1802-0005]
  3. HORIZON 2020-supported EU project MARBEL [H2020-EU.3.4.-963540]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses the development of electric vehicles and future battery requirements, focusing on research on novel materials at cell level and meeting dynamic demands. The process of translating end-user needs into battery requirements, as well as expected material developments and safety challenges for future development, are also addressed.
Nowadays, batteries for electric vehicles are expected to have a high energy density, allow fast charging and maintain long cycle life, while providing affordable traction, and complying with stringent safety and environmental standards. Extensive research on novel materials at cell level is hence needed for the continuous improvement of the batteries coupled towards achieving these requirements. This article firstly delves into future developments in electric vehicles from a technology perspective, and the perspective of changing end-user demands. After these end-user needs are defined, their translation into future battery requirements is described. A detailed review of expected material developments follows, to address these dynamic and changing needs. Developments on anodes, cathodes, electrolyte and cell level will be discussed. Finally, a special section will discuss the safety aspects with these increasing end-user demands and how to overcome these issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available