4.5 Article

Cultivation Method Effect on Schizochytrium sp. Biomass Growth and Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Production with the Use of Waste Glycerol as a Source of Organic Carbon

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14102952

Keywords

microalgae; heterotrophic culture; docosahexaenoic acid; glycerol; cultivation methods

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [WZ/WB-IIS/2/2019]
  2. [010/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the production yield of Schizochytrium sp. biomass and the efficiency of docosahexaenoic acid production using waste glycerol as a carbon source. Cultivation conditions were optimized, leading to high yields of biomass and docosahexaenoic acid production.
Inexpensive carbon sources offering an alternative to glucose are searched for to reduce costs of docosahexaenoic acid production by microalgae. The use of waste glycerol seems substantiated and prospective in this case. The objective of this study was to determine the production yield of heterotrophic microalgae Schizochytrium sp. biomass and the efficiency of docosahexaenoic acid production in various types of cultures with waste glycerol. Cultivation conditions were optimized using the Plackett-Burman method and Response Surface Methodology. The highest technological performance was obtained in the fed-batch culture, where the concentration of Schizochytrium sp. biomass reached 103.44 +/- 1.50 g/dm(3), the lipid concentration in Schizochytrium sp. biomass was at 48.85 +/- 0.81 g/dm(3), and the docosahexaenoic acid concentration at 21.98 +/- 0.36 g/dm(3). The highest docosahexaenoic acid content, accounting for 61.76 +/- 3.77% of total fatty acids, was determined in lipid bodies of the Schizochytrium sp. biomass produced in the batch culture, whereas the lowest one, accounting for 44.99 +/- 2.12% of total fatty acids, in those of the biomass grown in the fed-batch culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available