4.5 Review

A Review of Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure from the Perspective of Food-Energy-Water Nexus

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14154583

Keywords

green-blue infrastructure; food-energy-water nexus; tradeoff; small scale urban system

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52070021]
  2. Belmont Forum [NEXUS2016: 152]
  3. JPI Urban Europe [11221480]
  4. NSF, USA [1829224]
  5. 111 Project [B17005]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. ICER [1829224] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review article explores the impact of small scale urban green-blue infrastructure on the food-energy-water nexus, highlighting both its positive and negative effects, and pointing out the potential contributions and challenges of GBI.
Small scale urban green-blue infrastructure (indicated as GBI hereafter) comprises huge underexploited areas for urban development and planning. This review article aims to highlight the relevance and knowledge gaps regarding GBI from the perspective of the food-energy-water (FEW) nexus, these being key resources for the survival of human communities. In particular, this review was focused on publications on urban ecosystem services (positive effects) and dis-services (negative effects) associated with different GBI typologies. The review proved that GBI can contribute environmentally, socially, and economically to FEW security and urban sustainability. Yet, such positive effects must be considered against ecosystem dis-services tradeoffs, including urban food production, commonly connected with heavy water and energy consumption, specifically under dry climate conditions, and sometimes related to an excessive use of manure, pesticides, or fertilizers. These conditions could pose either a risk to water quality and local insect survival or serve enhanced mosquito breeding because of irrigation. Up to now, the review evidenced that few nexus modeling techniques have been discussed in terms of their benefits, drawbacks, and applications. Guidance is provided on the choice of an adequate modeling approach. Water, energy, and food are intrinsically associated physically. However, depending on their management, their tradeoffs are often increased. There is a need to minimize these tradeoffs and to build up synergies between food, energy, and water using a holistic approach. This is why the FEW nexus approach offers good insights to address the relation between three important individual resource components of sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available