4.7 Article

Maternal iron status during pregnancy compared with neonatal iron status better predicts placental iron transporter expression in humans

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 3541-3550

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600069R

Keywords

anemia; heme; TfR1 hepcidin; adolescents

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture [2005-35200, 2008-01857]
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [T32-DK007158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The placenta richly expresses nonheme and heme Fe transport proteins. To address the impact of maternal and neonatal Fe status and hepcidin on the regulation of these proteins, mRNA expression and protein abundance of nonheme and heme Fe transport proteins were evaluated in placental tissue from 154 adolescents. Regression analyses found maternal Fe status was significantly associated with multiple placental nonheme and heme transporters, whereas neonatal Fe status was related to only 3 heme transporters. Across statistical analyses, maternal Fe status was consistently associated with the placental nonheme Fe importer transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1). Protein abundance of TfR1 was related to midgestation maternal serum ferritin (SF) (beta = -0.32; P = 0.005) and serum TfR (beta = 0.25; P = 0.024). Protein abundance of the heme importer, proton-coupled folate transporter, was related to neonatal SF (beta = 0.30; P = 0.016) and serum TfR (beta = -0.46; P < 0.0001). Neonatal SF was also related to mRNA expression of the heme exporter feline leukemia virus subgroup C receptor 1 (beta = -0.30; P = 0.004). In summary, maternal Fe insufficiency during pregnancy predicts increased expression of the placental nonheme Fe transporter TfR1. Associations between placental heme Fe transporters and neonatal Fe status require further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available