4.7 Article

Regeneration in starved planarians depends on TRiC/CCT subunits modulating the unfolded protein response

Journal

EMBO REPORTS
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.202152905

Keywords

chaperonin; ER stress; hematopoietic stem cell; planarian; starvation

Funding

  1. Leibniz Institute on Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI)
  2. Federal Government of Germany
  3. State of Thuringia
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the PolyTarget collaborative research centre [CRC 1278]
  5. LGSA (Leibniz Graduate School on Ageing and Age Related Diseases) scholarship
  6. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Planarians can endure starvation by maintaining adult stem cell pools and regenerative capacity. TRiC/CCT subunits play a crucial role in maintaining regeneration under starvation conditions by modulating the unfolded protein response and maintaining ATP levels.
Planarians are able to stand long periods of starvation by maintaining adult stem cell pools and regenerative capacity. The molecular pathways that are needed for the maintenance of regeneration during starvation are not known. Here, we show that down-regulation of chaperonin TRiC/CCT subunits abrogates the regeneration capacity of planarians during starvation, but TRiC/CCT subunits are dispensable for regeneration in fed planarians. Under starvation, they are required to maintain mitotic fidelity and for blastema formation. We show that TRiC subunits modulate the unfolded protein response (UPR) and are required to maintain ATP levels in starved planarians. Regenerative defects in starved CCT-depleted planarians can be rescued by either chemical induction of mild endoplasmic reticulum stress, which leads to induction of the UPR, or by the supplementation of fatty acids. Together, these results indicate that CCT-dependent UPR induction promotes regeneration of planarians under food restriction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available