4.8 Article

Role of endopeptidases in peptidoglycan synthesis mediated by alternative cross-linking enzymes in Escherichia coli

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 40, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021108126

Keywords

endopeptidase; Escherichia coli; L, D-transpeptidase; peptidoglycan; beta-lactam

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency ANR RegOPeps [ANR-19-CE44-0007]
  2. Sorbonne-Universite [ED 515]
  3. French National Research Agency ANR [ANR-10-INBS-0009]
  4. IBISA
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-19-CE44-0007] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacteria resist turgor pressure through peptidoglycan, with endopeptidases playing a crucial role in the synthesis of cell wall, facilitating the formation of different cross-linking structures.
Bacteria resist to the turgor pressure of the cytoplasm through a net-like macromolecule, the peptidoglycan, made of glycan strands connected via peptides cross-linked by penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). We recently reported the emergence of beta-lactam resistance resulting from a bypass of PBPs by the YcbB L,D-transpeptidase (LdtD), which form chemically distinct 3 -> 3 cross-links compared to 4 -> 3 formed by PBPs. Here we show that peptidoglycan expansion requires controlled hydrolysis of cross-links and identify among eight endopeptidase paralogues the minimum enzyme complements essential for bacterial growth with 4 -> 3 (MepM) and 3 -> 3 (MepM and MepK) cross-links. Purified Mep endopeptidases unexpectedly displayed a 4 -> 3 and 3 -> 3 dual specificity implying recognition of a common motif in the two cross-link types. Uncoupling of the polymerization of glycan chains from the 4 -> 3 cross-linking reaction was found to facilitate the bypass of PBPs by YcbB. These results illustrate the plasticity of the peptidoglycan polymerization machinery in response to the selective pressure of beta-lactams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available