4.6 Article

Outcomes in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for maximal volume (PCI 39) appendiceal tumours

Journal

EJSO
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 1406-1410

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.138

Keywords

Peritonectomy; Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS); HIPEC; Appendiceal tumours

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that in a high-volume center in Australia, CRS + HIPEC is safe for selected patients with PCI 39. Despite the high morbidity, the overall survival for appendiceal tumors appears considerably better than debulking surgery.
Background: Higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) requires more extensive surgery and maybe associated with more limited outcomes. The aim of this study in a high-volume centre in Australia was to analyse the outcomes in PCI 39 patients regarding short and long term outcomes in appendiceal tumours. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients that underwent primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with PCI 39 at St George Hospital, Sydney from 1996 to 2018. Patients with appendiceal tumours (inclusive of high and low grade) were analysed. Factors contributing to high grade (III/IV Clavien-Dindo) morbidity and mortality were assessed. Results: Of the 1201 patients in the database, 58 patients had a PCI 39 from appendix tumours at their first operation. The overall survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 year was 91.2%, 79.5% and 62.9% respectively. The median survival was 87.2 months (96% CI 51.8-NR). The rate of major morbidity was 71%. The post -operative mortality incidence was 1.7%. The median hospital length of stay was 34 days (IQR:27-54 days). Conclusions: In an experienced centre CRS + HIPEC is safe in selected patients with PCI 39. Despite the high morbidity, the overall survival for appendiceal tumours appear considerably better than debulking surgery. Crown Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available