4.7 Software Review

In the loop: promoter-enhancer interactions and bioinformatics

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 980-995

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv097

Keywords

Chromatin loops; chromosome conformation capture; CTCF; enhancer prediction; histone modifications; promoter-enhancer interactions; SNPs; transcription factories

Funding

  1. Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo
  2. Department of Informatics, University of Oslo
  3. [231217/ F20]
  4. [3485238-2013]
  5. [419436 107692-PR-2007-0148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhancer-promoter regulation is a fundamental mechanism underlying differential transcriptional regulation. Spatial chromatin organization brings remote enhancers in contact with target promoters in cis to regulate gene expression. There is considerable evidence for promoter-enhancer interactions (PEIs). In the recent years, genome-wide analyses have identified signatures and mapped novel enhancers; however, being able to precisely identify their target gene(s) requires massive biological and bioinformatics efforts. In this review, we give a short overview of the chromatin landscape and transcriptional regulation. We discuss some key concepts and problems related to chromatin interaction detection technologies, and emerging knowledge from genome-wide chromatin interaction data sets. Then, we critically review different types of bioinformatics analysis methods and tools related to representation and visualization of PEI data, raw data processing and PEI prediction. Lastly, we provide specific examples of how PEIs have been used to elucidate a functional role of non-coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The topic is at the forefront of epigenetic research, and by highlighting some future bioinformatics challenges in the field, this review provides a comprehensive background for future PEI studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available