4.8 Article

Species richness and food-web structure jointly drive community biomass and its temporal stability in fish communities

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 2364-2377

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13857

Keywords

biomass; ecosystem functioning; fish; foodweb; natural settings; network structure; species richness; stability; synchrony; temperature

Categories

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE32-0002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that in stream fish communities, species richness and average trophic level are positively related to annual biomass; community stability is promoted by mean trophic level but decreased by species richness; environmental conditions affect biomass and its stability mainly through effects on richness and network structure.
Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning and food-web complexity-stability relationships are central to ecology. However, they remain largely untested in natural contexts. Here, we estimated the links among environmental conditions, richness, food-web structure, annual biomass and its temporal stability using a standardised monitoring dataset of 99 stream fish communities spanning from 1995 to 2018. We first revealed that both richness and average trophic level are positively related to annual biomass, with effects of similar strength. Second, we found that community stability is fostered by mean trophic level, while contrary to expectation, it is decreased by species richness. Finally, we found that environmental conditions affect both biomass and its stability mainly via effects on richness and network structure. Strikingly, the effect of species richness on community stability was mediated by population stability rather than synchrony, which contrasts with results from single trophic communities. We discuss the hypothesis that it could be a characteristic of multi-trophic communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available