4.5 Article

NGA-subduction global ground motion models with regional adjustment factors

Journal

EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 456-493

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/87552930211034889

Keywords

Subduction zone; ground motion model; earthquake hazard; seismic hazard; earth-quake ground motion characterization

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey [G16AP00181]
  2. UCLA Graduate Division and Civil & Environmental Engineering Department

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research develops semi-empirical ground motion models to predict seismic ground motion for subduction earthquakes. The models are developed using data analysis, regression analysis, simulations, and geometrical constraints, and can capture source and path effects for interface and intraslab events. The development of these models is important for seismic hazard assessment and building design.
We develop semi-empirical ground motion models (GMMs) for peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral accelerations for periods from 0.01 to 10 s, for the median orientation-independent horizontal component of subduction earthquake ground motion. The GMMs are applicable to interface and intraslab subduction earthquakes in Japan, Taiwan, Mexico, Central America, South America, Alaska, the Aleutian Islands, and Cascadia. The GMMs are developed using a combination of data inspection, data regression with respect to physics-informed functions, ground-motion simulations, and geometrical constraints for certain model components. The GMMs capture observed differences in source and path effects for interface and intraslab events, conditioned on moment magnitude, rupture distance, and hypocentral depth. Site effect and aleatory variability models are shared between event types. Regionalized GMM components include the model constant (that controls ground motion amplitude), anelastic attenuation, magnitude-scaling break point, linear site response, and sediment depth terms. We develop models for the aleatory between-event variability (tau), within-event variability (phi), single-station within-event variability (phi(S2S)), and site-to-site variability (phi(SS)). Ergodic analyses should use the median GMM and aleatory variability computed using the between-event and within-event variability models. An analysis incorporating non-ergodic site response should use the median GMM at the reference shear-wave velocity condition, a site-specific site response model, and aleatory variability computed using the between-event and single-station within-event variability models. Epistemic uncertainty in the median model is represented by standard deviations on the regional model constants, which facilitates scaled-backbone representations of model uncertainty in hazard analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available