4.7 Article

Sulfur aerosols in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibetan Plateau: Current knowledge and future perspectives

Journal

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103753

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19070202, XDA20040501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877315, 91837204]
  3. Kathmandu Center for Research and Education, CAS-TU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examines the impact of sulfur aerosols in polar regions and their relationship with human activities and climate change. It summarizes the spatio-temporal variability, isotope composition, and reconstruction methods of sulfur aerosols, and identifies future research needs in this area.
Sulfur aerosols, mainly composed of sulfate and methanesulfonic acid (MSA), significantly affect the Earth's radiation balance, biogeochemical cycles and ecosystems, especially in the polar regions with vulnerable environments. To better understand the relationship between anthropogenic activities and climate change, a comprehensive review is presented, covering sulfate and MSA concentrations and isotope composition from 18 sites in the Arctic, 22 sites in the Antarctic and 25 sites in the Tibetan Plateau. The spatio-temporal variability of sulfur aerosols and the potential factors controlling their concentrations are summarized, sulfur isotopes are used to identify the importance of anthropogenic vs. natural inputs, and ice cores are employed to reconstruct the paleo-evolution of atmospheric sulfates. Finally, this review discusses the need for future research on organosulfur aerosols, the mixing state of sulfur aerosols, their deposition fluxes and velocities, potential emissions by biomass burning, and the anticipated trends in sulfur aerosol concentrations in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibetan Plateau.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available