4.7 Article

Optimizing the performance of dye-sensitized upconversion nanoparticles

Journal

DYES AND PIGMENTS
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109428

Keywords

Dye sensitization; Organic and inorganic sensitizers; Upconversion nanoparticles; Optimization; FRET

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61805083, 31801968]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By optimizing the Yb3+ doping concentration and particle size, and selecting suitable organic dye sensitizers, the performance of dye-sensitized UCNPs can be maximized, with dye sensitization proving to be more favorable for smaller-sized UCNPs.
Upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are promising for bioimaging, sensing, and other applications, but their upconversion (UC) efficiency is far from satisfactory. Organic dye sensitization is considered to be an effective strategy to improve the performance of UCNPs. In this work, we provide direct evidence that organic sensitizer surpasses inorganic sensitizer in sensitization capability. To maximize the performance of dye-sensitized UCNPs, three critical factors, namely different optically inert lanthanide ions, Yb3+ doping concentration, and particle size, are systemically investigated and optimized. It is found that the optimal Yb3+ doping concentration and particle size are determined to be 20% and -19 nm for dye-sensitized UCNPs, while different optically inert lanthanide ions have negligible influence on this system. Importantly, our results suggest that dye sensitization is more favorable for improving the performance of smaller-sized UCNPs. Although ultrasmall UCNPs (<10 nm) are desirable for biomedical applications UCNPs due to their reduced toxicity, they suffer from extremely low UC efficiency and weak brightness. Fortunately, the strategy of dye sensitization turns out to be particularly useful for producing ultrasmall and ultrabright UCNPs, which are desirable for biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available