4.7 Review

Methods to improve the immunogenicity of plasmid DNA vaccines

Journal

DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 2575-2592

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.06.008

Keywords

Adjuvants; Administration routes; Delivery systems; Immunogenicity; Plasmid DNA vaccines

Funding

  1. FEDER funds through the POCI-COMPETE 2020 - Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization in Axis I-Strengthening research, technological development and innovation program [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007491]
  2. National Funds from the FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology) [UID/Multi/00709/2019]
  3. FCT [2020.10201.BD]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/Multi/00709/2019, 2020.10201.BD] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA vaccines are innovative approaches that show great potential in overcoming the limitations of traditional vaccines. While plasmid DNA vaccines have numerous advantages, there are still challenges in improving their immunogenicity.
DNA vaccines have emerged as innovative approaches that have great potential to overcome the limitations of current conventional vaccines. Plasmid DNA vaccines are often safer than other vaccines because they carry only antigen genetic information, are more stable and easier to produce, and can stimulate both humoral and cellular immune responses. Although the results of ongoing clinical trials are very promising, some limitations compromise the immunogenicity of these vaccines. Thus, this review describes different strategies that can be explored to improve the immunogenicity of plasmid DNA vaccines, including the optimization of the plasmid vector backbone, the use of different methods for vaccine delivery, the use of alternative administration routes and the inclusion of adjuvants. In combination, these improvements could lead to the successful clinical use of plasmid DNA vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available