4.7 Article

Modelling the biodiversity enhancement value of seagrass beds

Journal

DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 2036-2049

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13379

Keywords

biodiversity; biogenic habitat; conservation; enhancement value; habitat restoration; management; sea level rise; seagrass; species distribution models

Funding

  1. Gulf Research Program of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine [2000009025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current seagrass beds support more species than unvegetated habitats, and restoration in potential habitats would also increase biodiversity. However, projections show that sea level rise may lead to significant losses in seagrass beds and restoration areas, reducing the enhancement value provided by seagrasses.
Aim Seagrass beds are declining globally and are increasingly vulnerable to sea level rise (SLR), which could have consequences for the rich biodiversity they support. Spatial variation in the role of seagrass beds in enhancing biodiversity is poorly resolved, limiting our ability to set priorities for conservation and restoration. We aimed to model the biodiversity enhancement value of seagrass beds. Location Florida Gulf Coast, USA. Methods We used generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) to describe the distribution, total cover and species composition of seagrass beds and to estimate their effects on spatial patterns of faunal species richness under three scenarios. Specifically, we: (a) quantified the biodiversity enhancement value of current seagrass beds, (b) inferred the biodiversity value of potential restoration areas and (c) projected potential changes in the distribution and biodiversity enhancement value of seagrass beds due to SLR using low (+0.50 m) and high (+1.0 m) SLR forecasts for 2100. Results Current seagrass beds supported 43%-64% more species than unvegetated habitats, even when accounting for spatial variability in predicted faunal richness due to other environmental, seascape, temporal and geographic factors. Seagrass restoration in potential habitats would also increase biodiversity in the near-term (i.e., 43%-45% above unvegetated levels). However, model projections indicate that SLR could result in significant losses of current seagrass beds and potential restoration areas, causing contracted distributions and lower seagrass cover. Overall, these changes could result in significant reductions in the enhancement value provided by seagrasses. Although, there could also be many suitable locations for seagrasses by 2100, with some having either comparable or potentially increased enhancement value. Main conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of considering spatial variation in biodiversity benefits when planning for seagrass conservation and restoration and when managing the impacts of SLR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available