4.1 Article

Increased risk of eosinophilic esophagitis with poor environmental quality as measured by the Environmental Quality Index

Journal

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab041

Keywords

environmental quality; eosinophilic esophagitis; EQI; geospatial analysis; risk factor

Funding

  1. NIH [T32 DK007634, R01 DK101856]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the association between environmental quality and the risk of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) using the Environmental Quality Index. The findings showed that poor environmental quality, particularly in terms of water quality, was associated with an increased risk of EoE, while better air and land quality were inversely associated with EoE. Further research to identify specific water pollutants that may play a role in EoE etiology may be necessary.
Geographic differences in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) prevalence suggest the possibility that environmental exposures contribute to EoE pathogenesis. We aimed to examine the association between environmental quality and risk of EoE, using the Environmental Quality Index (EQI), which provides quantification of environmental quality in five domains: air, land, water, built, and sociodemographic for all counties in the United States. To do this, we performed a case-control study in a large pathology database. EoE cases were defined by =15 eosinophils per high-power field with other pathologic diagnoses excluded; controls did not have EoE. The pathology data were geocoded and linked with the EQI by county of residence. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of EoE with overall EQI and for each domain, after adjusting for sex, age, and proportion minority race or ethnicity at the county level (higher EQI score indicates worse environmental quality). Of 29,802 EoE cases and 593,329 controls analyzed, odds of EoE were highest in the worst quintile of EQI (OR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.04-1.50), which was largely explained by poor scores in the water domain (OR: 1.33; 1.17-1.50). Conversely, odds of EoE were reduced with higher scores in the air domain (OR: 0.87, 0.74-1.03) and land domain (OR0.87; 0.76-0.99). Poor EQI, mostly reflected by poor water quality, was associated with increased odds of EoE, while poor air and land quality were inversely associated with EoE. Additional work to identify specific water pollutants that may have an etiologic role in EoE may be warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available