4.4 Review

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and foot functions in subjects with chronic plantar fasciitis: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 44, Issue 18, Pages 5007-5014

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1928775

Keywords

Heel pain syndrome; extracorporeal shock wave therapy; plantar fasciitis; systematic review; rehabilitation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review synthesizes evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis and indicates a moderate confirmation for improving pain and foot function in these patients. It suggests that extracorporeal shock wave therapy could be a promising rehabilitation intervention for chronic plantar fasciitis.
Purpose The aim of this review was to synthesize current evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, and foot function in subjects with plantar fasciitis. Materials and methods A comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were done to identify randomized controlled trials of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in subjects with plantar fasciitis. PEDro scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of included trials. Visual Analogue Scale and Foot Function Index were the primary outcome measures of this review. Due to varying of entailed trials, meta-analysis was not carried out. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials with 658 patients were included. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy exhibited a moderate confirmation to better pain, and foot function of individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis. Conclusion Extracorporeal shock wave therapy could be a promising rehabilitation intervention and might support to improve pain, and foot function of subjects with chronic plantar fasciitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available