4.6 Article

A survey on estimation schemes in molecular communications

Journal

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103163

Keywords

Molecular communication; Parameter estimation; Channel estimation; Statistical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This survey paper focuses on estimation schemes in molecular communication systems, including parameter estimation and channel estimation. A comprehensive survey on distance estimation, as well as estimation of other parameters and channel estimation, is presented for the first time. The paper also examines noise impact and performance evaluation metrics, and provides numerical results comparing the performance of different distance estimation schemes. Future research directions in parameter estimation and channel estimation are identified and discussed.
This survey paper focuses on the estimation schemes in molecular communication (MC) systems. The existing studies in estimation schemes can be divided into parameter estimation (e.g., distance, diffusion coefficient, and flow velocity) and channel estimation. In this paper, we present, for the first time, a comprehensive survey on i) distance estimation, since distance is the most widely estimated parameter in current studies, ii) estimation of other parameters (i.e., the parameters excluding distance), and iii) channel estimation that focuses on the channel impulse response (CIR). Moreover, we examine the noise that may impact on the estimation performance and the metrics applied to evaluate the performance of different estimation schemes. Numerical results are provided to compare the performance of different distance estimation schemes. In addition, future research directions in parameter estimation and channel estimation are identified and discussed. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available