Journal
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume 66, Issue 8, Pages 2513-2532Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07114-y
Keywords
Biosimilars; Infliximab; Adalimumab; CT-P13; SB2; SB5; Inflammatory bowel disease; Anti-TNF
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The use of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the treatment of IBD, but their high cost led to the introduction of biosimilars to reduce expenses. Despite their potential benefits, the adoption of biosimilars varies significantly between the USA and Europe.
The introduction of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor-alpha has revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by improving quality of life, decreasing the frequency and length of hospital admissions, and reducing corticosteroid use. Nevertheless, biologics are very expensive, substantially contributing to the cost of care for patients with IBD. To reduce this cost and improve treatment access, biosimilars, which are therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (biologicals) similar to but not identical to the reference biologic, were introduced. Despite their potential benefits, the adoption and uptake of biosimilars have varied considerably across the USA and Europe. Here, we highlight the current biosimilar therapeutic landscape, discuss barriers to their use, and provide an overview of published studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of biosimilars in IBD.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available