Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas

Background: Current post-polypectomy guidelines do not consider adenoma location. We compared the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia (CRN) according to adenoma location. Methods: We collected data from 9710 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy after adenoma removal. Patients were classified according to baseline adenoma location: distal only (n = 4665), proximal only (n = 3827), and both sides (n = 1218). Results: The risk of metachronous CRN in patients with proximal only adenomas was higher than that in those with distal only adenomas (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04- 1.21), while the risk of metachronous advanced CRN (ACRN) was not different between the two groups. Among patients aged < 50 years, the risk of metachronous CRN in those with proximal only non-advanced adenomas (NAAs) was higher than that in those with only distal NAAs, while among patients aged > 50 years, the risk in those with proximal only advanced adenomas (AAs) was higher than that in those with distal only AAs. However, the risk of metachronous ACRN did not differ based on adenoma location in patients aged < 50 and > 50 years. Conclusions: Proximal adenoma was associated with an increased risk of metachronous CRN, but not with an increased risk of metachronous ACRN, supporting the current guidelines recommending the same surveillance interval for distal and proximal adenoma without discrimination by adenoma location. (c) 2021 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

This study compared the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia (CRN) according to adenoma location and found that proximal adenoma was associated with an increased risk of metachronous CRN, but not with an increased risk of metachronous advanced CRN (ACRN).