4.3 Article

A New Fitting Approach for Providing Adequate Comfort and Visual Performance in Keratoconus: Soft HydroCone (Toris K) Lenses

Journal

EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 225-230

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000183

Keywords

Keratoconus; Contact lens; Soft HydroCone contact lens

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:To evaluate the comfort and visual performance of soft HydroCone (Toris K) silicone hydrogel lenses in keratoconus patients.Methods:Fifty eyes of 50 keratoconic patients who were fitted with the Toris K lens were included in the study. All patients were evaluated at baseline and after 2 weeks of lens wear. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuities were measured. Corneal topography, ocular aberrations, and point spread function (PSF) were obtained using NIDEK-OPD Scan. Comfort level and visual performance in daytime and nighttime conditions were scored from 0 to 5 after 2 weeks of lens wear.Results:Best-corrected visual acuity was significantly better with the Toris K lens (P<0.001). Mean increase in visual acuity with the lens was 4.5 lines. Mean K-1, K-2, and K-max values significantly decreased with the lens (P<0.001). Both total and higher-order root-mean-square errors were significantly corrected with the Toris K lens (P<0.001 and P=0.038, respectively). A significant correction of total coma and trefoil aberrations was achieved with the lens. Also, PSF values were significantly increased with the lens (P<0.001). Although comfort scores in 46 eyes (92.0%) were classified as good/excellent, only 4 eyes (8.0%) had moderate comfort scores. Visual acuity was classified as good/excellent in 46 eyes (92.0%) in daytime and in 38 eyes (76%) in nighttime conditions.Conclusions:Soft HydroCone silicone hydrogel keratoconus lenses should be considered as alternative visual correction for keratoconus patients. The soft and full-custom design provides optimal comfort and visual performance for the patients' daily requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available