4.7 Article

Optimization of parallel/cross flow multi-effect desalination system with flue gas pre-heating considering thermo-vapor compression coupling

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 506, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.114998

Keywords

Multi-effect distillation; Waste heat recovery; Process optimization; Economic analysis; Exergy analysis; Parallel/cross flow

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new scheme combining thermo-vapor compression and utilization of low-grade heat is proposed to reduce the energy consumption of low-temperature multi-effect distillation, resulting in improved water production and lower water production costs under optimal conditions. The study concludes that the new system outperforms others in terms of water production and production costs.
To reduce the energy consumption of low-temperature multi-effect distillation (LT-MED), a new scheme was proposed by combining the thermo-vapor compression (TVC) and utilizing the low-grade heat of flue gas in the thermal power generating unit for feed brine preheating. For further improvement, the concept of the mass fraction is especially proposed and considered. Taking the gained output ratio (GOR) and water production cost as the objective functions, the effects of temperature difference, TVC positions were investigated by thermodynamic and economic analysis. The optimal effect number was selected for the LT-MED system under the lowest investment. The results indicated that GOR increased and the water production cost decreased with the backward movement of TVC. The lowest water production cost was obtained under the conditions that N = 5 and TVC was at the 4th effect with the mass fraction R-mf is 0. Thermodynamic, economic, and exergy analysis was performed on the selected systems and the control group. It was concluded that the new proposed system was superior to the others in both the water production and the water production cost. GOR increased from 9.67 to 10.94 and the water production cost fell from 3.13 $/m(3) to 2.84 $/m(3).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available