4.5 Article

Adjuvant PD-1 inhibitor versus high-dose interferon α-2b for Chinese patients with cutaneous and acral melanoma: A retrospective cohort analysis

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15067

Keywords

acral melanoma; adjuvant; cutaneous melanoma; interferon alpha-2b; PD-1 inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Guangzhou Health and Family Planning Commission Technology Project [20191A1515011263]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772910]
  3. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center for Distinguished Young Scholar [PT04180201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study found that adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors provided significantly longer RFS and DMFS in Chinese patients with stage IIIB/C cutaneous melanoma compared to high-dose interferon alpha-2b (HDI), but there was no significant advantage observed in patients with acral melanoma.
The clinical efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors as an adjuvant treatment for Asian melanoma patients has not yet been determined. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 90 Chinese patients with completely resected, stage III cutaneous or acral melanoma who received either adjuvant PD-1 inhibitor or high-dose interferon alpha-2b (HDI). Anti-PD-1 treatment resulted in significantly longer RFS and DMFS than HDI in cutaneous melanoma patients, with hazard ratios (HRs) (anti-PD-1 versus HDI) of 0.402 (95% CI, 0.183-0.886) and 0.324 (95%CI, 0.122 to 0.861) for RFS and DMFS, respectively. However, adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment had no advantage over HDI in acral melanoma patients with HRs (anti-PD-1 versus HDI) of 1.204 (95% CI, 0.521 to 2.781) and 1.968(95% CI, 0.744-5.209) for RFS and DMFS, respectively. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment yielded a significantly better prognosis than HDI in Chinese patients with stage IIIB/C cutaneous melanoma, but a significant difference was not observed in those with acral melanoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available