4.1 Article

Comparison of biochemical and antimicrobial activities of different honey samples

Journal

CZECH JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 273-280

Publisher

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/38/2021-CJFS

Keywords

antioxidant; FRAP; MIC; monofloral honey; phenolics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a good correlation between total phenolic content and the biological activity of honey samples. Honey samples from Doganyol, Malatya, Turkey showed moderate antimicrobial activity, especially against Gram-positive bacteria.
Honey, a natural healing agent and a sweet food, has been used since ancient times. A honey sample could possess many biological activities depending on its chemical composition. The amount and the diversity of these minor components of honey mainly depend on the floral sources. That is why the biological activity of the honey sample obtained in a region should be determined. In this study, total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, melissopalynological analyses and antimicrobial activity of twenty honey samples obtained from Doganyol, Malatya, Turkey were examined. In order to determine the in vitro antibacterial activity of honey samples, the agar well diffusion (AWD) method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays were used. For this purpose, ten Gram-positive bacteria and eight Gram-negative bacteria were used. Total phenolic content was found in the range from 9.68 +/- 0.72 to 29.40 +/- 1.03 mg GAE g(-1) sample. Antioxidant activity of honey samples varied from 2.21 +/- 0.46 to 6.03 +/- 1.11 mu mol FeSO4 7H(2)O g(-1). Honey samples showed moderate antimicrobial activity against tested microorganisms, especially against Gram-positive bacteria. It could be concluded from our findings that there is a good correlation between total phenolic content and the biological activity of honey samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available