4.3 Review

Efficacy and safety of oral Pentasa (prolonged-release mesalazine) in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 1891-1900

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1968813

Keywords

Aminosalicylates; inflammatory bowel disease; delayed-release; effectiveness; mesalamine

Funding

  1. Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of oral Pentasa in treating active UC and maintaining remission. Pentasa demonstrated superiority over placebo in inducing and maintaining remission, and had similar efficacy to other 5-ASAs. Additionally, Pentasa was found to be better tolerated than sulfasalazine in maintaining remission.
Background Pentasa (prolonged-release mesalazine [5-ASA]) has been available for >30 years as an effective treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken to provide an up-to-date evaluation of oral Pentasa efficacy and safety for induction and maintenance of remission. Methods Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, from inception to 02 December 2020. Unpublished studies were also sourced. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model and Bayesian inference compared Pentasa (tablets, granules, capsules) against placebo and other 5-ASAs. Results Twelve studies involving 3674 patients treated with Pentasa were identified. Pentasa 2-4 g/day was superior to placebo at inducing (absolute risk difference [ARD] at 8 weeks 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.21; p < .001) and maintaining (ARD 6-12 months 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.33; p < .05) remission (clinical/endoscopic). Against other 5-ASAs, Pentasa had similar efficacy for induction (ARD <0.001, 95% CI -0.05-0.05) and maintenance (ARD 0.01, 95% CI -0.07-0.08) treatment using randomized controlled trial data. Upon inclusion of real-world study data, Pentasa was significantly better at maintaining remission compared both to Eudragit-S mesalazine and sulfasalazine (ARD 0.04, 95% CI 0.02-0.06; p < .001). Pentasa (1-4 g/day) had similar treatment-related adverse event rates to placebo (ARD 0.02, 95% CI -0.03-0.06) and Eudragit-L/S mesalazines (2.25-3 vs 2.4-3 g/day, respectively; ARD -0.03, 95% CI -0.12-0.05), but was better tolerated than sulfasalazine (3 g/day) (ARD 0.07, 95% CI 0.003-0.14; p < .05). Conclusion This study confirms oral Pentasa is efficacious and well-tolerated in treating active UC and maintaining remission. The availability of multiple forms of Pentasa supports physicians' ability to individualize treatment and optimize dosing to improve outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available