4.7 Article

High Proportion of Chiral Crystallization of Achiral Indolyl Sulfonamides: Effect of Intermolecular Interactions

Journal

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 4380-4389

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hoansha Foundation
  2. Kakenhi [16590011, 25670006]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16590011, 25670006] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of indole moieties was found to have a significant impact on the chiral crystallization of molecules, with N(indole)H⋯O interactions and T-shape contacts being more favorable for chiral crystallization compared to π⋯π interactions.
We investigated the effect of indole moieties on chiral crystallization. In this regard, we assessed the influence of intermolecular interactions and contacts on the assembly of these molecules. A systematic analysis of 62 crystal structures of secondary aromatic sulfonamides bearing 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-aminoindolyl groups revealed that the proportion of indolyl compounds showing chiral crystallization was apparently higher (21%, except for kryptoracemate) than that of nonindolyl sulfonamides (11%). Moreover, 33% (5 out of 15 crystals) and 44% (7 out of 16 crystals) of 4- and 7-indolyl sulfonamide derivatives preferred chiral crystallization, respectively. This suggested a correlation between the type of contact and the chirality of the assembly of adjacent molecules. Specifically, the proportion of achiral indolyl sulfonamides undergoing chiral crystallization was drastically increased by N(indole)H center dot center dot center dot O interactions, slightly increased by C(sp(2))H center dot center dot center dot pi interactions, and decreased owing to pi...pi interactions. These tendencies were also true for sulfonamides with different substituents, which suggested that the T-shape contact would be more favorable than pi...pi interactions for chiral crystallization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available