4.8 Review

Tuning photoactive metal-organic frameworks for luminescence and photocatalytic applications

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 437, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213757

Keywords

Metal-organic Frameworks; Porous materials; Photoactive materials; Luminescence; Sensing; Photocatalysis

Funding

  1. Science Foundation, Ireland [13/IA/1896, 13/IA/1865]
  2. European Research Council [SUPRAMOL -CoG 2014-647719]
  3. SFI AMBER Research Centre
  4. SSPC Research Centre
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/IA/1896] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are versatile porous materials constructed from organic and inorganic components that have been widely explored for various applications. This review focuses on the applications of photoactive MOFs, discussing the influence of MOF components on the materials' optical and electronic properties. Current developments include using luminescent MOFs as chemical sensors, light emitting materials, and designing MOF-based photocatalysts for water splitting, CO2 reduction, and organic reactions.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of porous materials, constructed from organic and inorganic components. MOFs have been explored for a diverse range of applications due to their tunable structures, porosities, and properties. This review highlights examples of the applications of photoactive MOFs, with a focus on the effect of MOF components, such as organic linkers, inorganic units and framework guests, on the optical and electronic properties of the materials. Developments in utilising luminescent MOFs as chemical sensors and as light emitting materials are discussed, in addition to recent advances in designing MOF-based photocatalysts for water splitting, CO2 reduction and organic reactions. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available