4.7 Article

Effect of fiber size, cyclic moisture absorption and fungal decay on the durability of natural fiber composites

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 286, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122819

Keywords

Wood plastic composites (WPCs); Durability; Mechanical properties; Cyclic moisture absorption; Polypropylene; Fungal attack; Coupling agents

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 1062221E011136, MOST 107-2622-8-011-005-TE4, MOST 108-2622-8-011-004-TE4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research investigated the impact of different lignocellulosic fiber sizes and additives on the durability of wood plastic composites after water absorption/desorption. The results show that finer wood particulates absorbed less moisture and adding MA helped maintain modulus while reducing moisture absorption during cyclic tests.
This research investigated the effect of different lignocellulosic fiber sizes and additives on the durability of wood plastic composites (WPCs) after water absorption/desorption. WPCs were prepared by blending wood flour (20, 80, 120 mesh) with polypropylene (PP). Polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride (MA) and zinc borate (ZB) were added in the formulation to improve the properties of the WPCs. Our results show that the fiber size significantly affects moisture absorption and that the damage accumulates during the cyclic absorption tests and affects the mechanical properties. WPCs with finer wood particulates absorbed less moisture. Adding MA helped maintain the modulus and reduced the moisture absorption of the WPCs during cyclic moisture absorption tests. Because ZB may dissolve in water during the moisture absorption experiment, the addition of ZB did not retard a fungal attack. Although cyclic moisture absorption reduced the mechanical properties, it did not enhance the fungal attack. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available