4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of mixed-mode I/II fracture behavior of parallel strand bamboo

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123127

Keywords

Engineered bamboo composite; Mixed-mode bending test; Fracture process zone; Additional crack length; Fracture criterion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the fracture behavior of parallel strand bamboo and confirmed the enhancement of toughness due to the fracture process zone. Proposed elliptical and linear fracture criteria contribute to the application confidence of engineered bamboo composites in civil engineering.
The past decade has seen the rapid development of engineered bamboo composites in the civil engineering field. They have excellent mechanical properties but are susceptible to cracks, which may affect the structural performance and reduce the load-bearing capacity of the composites. Therefore, it is more reasonable to consider the fracture behavior in structural design. For this purpose, this study investigated the fracture behavior of parallel strand bamboo, a kind of engineered bamboo composite using mixed-mode bending tests. The enhancement of fracture process zone (FPZ) on the toughness was confirmed. The additional crack length induced by the presence of FPZ was evaluated, which was 14.65 mm for mode I fracture and 21.12 mm for mode II fracture, respectively. The elliptical fracture criterion G(I)/G(Ic) + (G(II)/G(IIc))(2.23) = 1 applied to the initiation fracture toughness envelope, while the linear fracture criterion G(I)/G(IR) + G(II)/G(IIR) = 1 was more applicable to describe propagation fracture toughness envelope. The proposed fracture failure-based criterion will contribute to the application confidence of engineered bamboo composite in the civil engineering field. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available