Journal
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104755
Keywords
Brachytherapy; Dose reconstruction; Heterogeneity correction; Monte Carlo; Deep learning
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation [SNRF 320030_176052]
- Private Foundation of Geneva University Hospitals [RC-06-01]
- Iran's Ministry of Science
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study introduced a personalized brachytherapy dosimetry approach based on deep learning, which improves accuracy while avoiding the computational burden of Monte Carlo calculations and simplifications of TG-43. Experimental results showed that this method exhibited comparable performance to the Monte Carlo method in dose prediction.
Background and purpose: Accurate calculation of the absorbed dose delivered to the tumor and normal tissues improves treatment gain factor, which is the major advantage of brachytherapy over external radiation therapy. To address the simplifications of TG-43 assumptions that ignore the dosimetric impact of medium heterogene-ities, we proposed a deep learning (DL)-based approach, which improves the accuracy while requiring a reasonable computation time. Materials and methods: We developed a Monte Carlo (MC)-based personalized brachytherapy dosimetry simulator (PBrDoseSim), deployed to generate patient-specific dose distributions. A deep neural network (DNN) was trained to predict personalized dose distributions derived from MC simulations, serving as ground truth. The paired channel input used for the training is composed of dose distribution kernel in water medium along with the full-volumetric density maps obtained from CT images reflecting medium heterogeneity. Results: The predicted single-dwell dose kernels were in good agreement with MC-based kernels serving as reference, achieving a mean relative absolute error (MRAE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.16 +/- 0.42% and 4.2 +/- 2.7 x 10(-4) (Gy.sec(-1)/voxel), respectively. The MRAE of the dose volume histograms (DVHs) between the DNN and MC calculations in the clinical target volume were 1.8 +/- 0.86%, 0.56 +/- 0.56%, and 1.48 +/- 0.72% for D90, V150, and V100, respectively. For bladder, sigmoid, and rectum, the MRAE of D5cc between the DNN and MC calculations were 2.7 +/- 1.7%, 1.9 +/- 1.3%, and 2.1 +/- 1.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed DNN-based personalized brachytherapy dosimetry approach exhibited comparable performance to the MC method while overcoming the computational burden of MC calculations and over-simplifications of TG-43.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available